Report any bugs here and we'll post fixes
Moderators: Sascha Willems, Thomas
by Witek900 » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:44 am
I have problem with Newton versions above 2.03 (2.04, 2.06, 2.07, 2.08)
In 2.03 my scene looks like this:
http://www.4shared.com/file/127323766/108b17b6/203.htmlThis red boxes are AABB's of each body (from NewtonBodyGetAABB). Everything works ok, boxes fall on a floor and bounce.
In 2.04, 2.06, 2.08 it looks like that:
http://www.4shared.com/file/127323790/7e70ae4c/208.htmlLook at AABBs. They are smaller and translated in random directions. When i drop boxes, they fly through the floor.
I just replaced Newton.dll, i have changed nothing in source corde.
Please help!
-
Witek900
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:29 pm
- Location: Warsaw
by Julio Jerez » Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:16 am
Is this and Iphone demo?
are you saying that the funtyion NewtonBodyGetAABB does not work in the iphone.
just in the iphone or does this apply to the Mac buidl as well?
-
Julio Jerez
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 12249
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 2:18 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
-
by Witek900 » Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:54 am
This demo was running on Windows Vista (compiled by Delphi). Not only NewtonBodyGetAABB works bad, but whole Newton (no collisions). In 2.03 everything is excelent
-
Witek900
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:29 pm
- Location: Warsaw
by Witek900 » Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:54 am
I solved it
I had to download new header file, because in function such as NewtonCreateBox there was additional parameter "int shapeID".
Julio what is this "shapeID" used for?
-
Witek900
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:29 pm
- Location: Warsaw
by Julio Jerez » Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:59 am
Cool, solved a problem byt doing nothing, Just the way I like it.
Witek900 wrote:Julio what is this "shapeID" used for?
see advance Materials tutorial in the wiki
-
Julio Jerez
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 12249
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 2:18 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
-
by JernejL » Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:11 pm
I am suprised it even worked without any crash without the extra parameter, anyway good that you got it solved
-
JernejL
-
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 2:00 pm
- Location: Slovenia
-
by Stucuk » Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:37 pm
Delfi wrote:I am suprised it even worked without any crash without the extra parameter, anyway good that you got it solved
As long as the value of the parameter isn't important things seem to work fine if your header doesn't match the DLL. My Newton test thing seemed to work fine when i was using a header that didn't have the thread params added(Note: This was a while back).
-
Stucuk
-
- Posts: 801
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Scotland
-
Return to Bugs and Fixes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests